TLC DETECTION AND RECOVERY OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDE PHOSALONE FROM VISCERA USING COPPER (II) ACETYL ACETONATE.
TLC DETECTION AND RECOVERY OF ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDE PHOSALONE FROM VISCERA USING COPPER (II) ACETYL ACETONATE.
Arun G. Bhoi
Arun’s Institute of Forensic Sciences, Research and Education, Pune -411 028 (India).
Email : arun.bhoi@gmail.com
(e-J. Foren. Crime Inv. 2013, 9, 2, Art. 1)
Received on : 10th Jan. 2013.
Accepted on : 16th Jan. 2013.
ABSTRACT
Phosalone (Zolone) has replaced many of the chlorine containing insecticides used for controlling pests on agricultural crops. A number of reagents are reported for the detection and determination of organophosphorus insecticides but these are not specific for the phosalone. The use of copper(II) acetylacetonate as a specific spray reagent is reported here for the detection of phosalone on TLC. Phosalone after elution on TLC plates is hydrolysed using sodium hydroxide solution and then sprayed with copper acetylacetonate reagent. Phosalone appears as a brown spot. Other insecticides do not interfere in the detection. The detection limit for phosalone is ca. 2μg. The recovery of phosalone from viscera was found to be 85%.
KEY WORDS : Phosalone, Zolone, insecticide, thin-layer chromatography, TLC, hydrolysis, copper acetylacetonate, recovery, viscera, forensic.
INTRODUCTION
Phosalone (Zolone; phosphorodithioic acid, S-ester with 6-choloro-3-(mercaptomethyl)-2-benzoxazolinone) is a chlorine containing dithiophosphoric acid derivative insecticide. LD50 for phosalone is 120-175 mg/kg orally in rats [1]. It has higher chemical stability and less toxicity for animals as compared to many of the chlorine and phosphorous containing insecticides. Therefore, phosalone has been preferentially used for the protection of seeds, seedlings and agriculture crops. Unfortunately, this has also been misused in many of the homicidal and suicidal cases.
Number of gas chromatographic [2,3], spectrophotometric [4-6] and thin-layer chromatographic [7,8] methods are described in the literature for the detection of phosalone. However, these methods are tedious and need a well equipped instrumental laboratory. The use of copper (II) acetylacetonate as a spray reagent is described here for specific detection of phosalone on silica gel G coated TLC plates.
EXPERIMENTAL
Reagents:
All reagents used were of analytical reagent grade. Glass distilled water and 95% ethyl alcohol were used throughout.
Sodium hydroxide solution (10%): 10g of NaOH was dissolved in small quantity of distilled water and made up to 100 ml.
Copper (II) acetylacetone solution (0.25%): 250 mg of copper (II) acetylacetonate was dissolved in chloroform and made up to 100 ml.
Phosalone Standard Solution (1mg/ml) : 10 mg of commercial grade phosalone (99%) was dissolved in 9.9 ml of 95% ethyl alcohol.
PROCEDURE
A standard glass TLC plate of the size of 10cm x 20cm was coated with a slurry of silica gel G in distilled water (1:2 ) to a thickness of 0.25mm. Coated plates were dried in air and activated at 110 degree centigrade for minimum 1 h. Activated plates were cooled. A 2 μl quantity of a standard solution of phosalone (1mg/1ml) was spotted on TLC plate. The plate was then developed in a pre-saturated flat bottom TLC chamber using n-hexane and acetone (8:2, v/v) as a developing solvent mixture. After the solvent had travelled 10 cm distance on the TLC plate it was taken out, air dried and sprayed with 10% of sodium hydroxide solution and subsequently with 0.25% copper (II) acetylacetonate reagent solution. A prominent brown spot was visualized at Rf – value 0.60 on the TLC plate for phosalone.
RECOVERY EXPERIMENT OF PHOSALONE FROM VISCERAL MATERIAL
An standard alcoholic solution (1 ml) equivalent to 1 mg of phosalone was added to 50 g of minced visceral material (stomach – intestine with contents and liver, spleen, kidneys, lungs), homogenized and was kept in situ for about 72 hours. For the extraction of phosalone, the contents were soaked in 100 ml of diethyl ether at least for 15 minutes with intermittent stirring. The ether layer was separated out using separating funnel. The visceral material was re-extracted using 50 ml of diethyl ether, twice. All the ether extracts were combined in a steel capsule and the solvent was allowed to get evaporated at room temperature. The residue (phosalone) left was re-dissolved in 1 ml of an ethanol. A 10 micro liter quantity of it was spotted on activated TLC plate along with 10 micro liter quantity of each of the standard phosalone solutions containing known concentrations of 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5 and 10 mg per 10 ml in ethanol. Te plate was then developed as described in the procedure section and sprayed with 10% sodium hydroxide solution and copper (II) acetylacetonate reagent. The intensity of the brown spot of the residue obtained from visceral material visually agreed with the spot resulting from a standard solution containing 8.5 mg of phosalone per 10 ml. Thus the recovery for phosalone was ca. 85%.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Alkaline sodium hydroxide solution when sprayed on TLC plate it rapidly hydrolyses Phosalone producing sodium salt of 6-chloro-benzenexaazolone, diethyl dithiophosphoric acid and formaldehyde. It is postulated that the sodium salt formed, in turn, reacts with copper acetylacetonate and produces the brown coloured complex. The reagent used is selective for phosalone. The detection limit is calculated as 2 microgram. Other organophosphorus insecticides such as thimet, phosphamidon, fenitrothion, nuvan, monocrotophos, ekalux, solvirex and organochlorine insecticides such as, BHC, DDT, endosulfan, aldrin, endrin, dieldrin did not give any coloured spots. Dimethoate, malathion, methyl parathion and pyrethroids insecticides did not interfere by way of colour and Rf – values. Carbamate insecticides have been studied, separately, with the same reagents.
Since many of the reagents described for the detection of the insecticides did not respond to phosalone, the reagent studied here can be used for the detection and semi-quantitative determination of phosalone in the extracts of biological material (viscera) submitted in forensic laboratories and commercial samples.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Author’s thanks are due to Prof. (Dr.) S. B. Kulkarni, Head (Ex.), Dept. Of Chemistry, University of Pune, Maharashtra (India) and the Director, Directorate of Forensic Science Labs. M. S., Mumbai (India).
REFERENCES
[1] Martha W., The Merck Index, An Encyclopedia of Chemicals and Drugs, Merck and Co., Inc., USA, 1976, p-955.
[2] Spenser W. F., Iwata Y., Kilgore W. W. and Knaak J. B.; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1977, 18, 656.
[3] Their H. P., Stijve T. and Discrense H.; Lebenmittelchem. Gerichtl. Chem., 1989, 43, 121 (Ger.).
[4] Syoyama M., Miyachi Y. and Sakakibara J.; Bunseki Kagaku, 1976, 25, 179 (Japanese).
[5] Novikova K. F. and Mel’fser F. R.; Zh. Analit. Khim., 1971, 26, 1651 (Russ.).
[6] Makarova S. V., Khenelnitsakaya V. N. and Eliseeva M. A.; Zar. Lab., 1974, 40, 792 (Russ.).
[7] Rodinova T. V., Belskaya G. G., Ivanov V. M. and Makarova S. V.; Zh. Anal. Khim.; 1987, 42, 1125 (Russ.).
[8] Sevelkar M. T., Patil V. B. and Katkar H. N.; J. Assoc. Off. Ana. Chem., 1991, 74, 545.